Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedLisa VandevoordSep 22, 2026
Asked the council to slow down on removing FAR maximums in R6/R7, saying the public hasn't been given enough information to understand the change.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 36:16 →OpposedLori HeaterSep 22, 2026
Asked the council to keep the 3.5/4.0 FAR limits and add objective historic-resource buffers to the interim ordinance.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 39:20 →OpposedAndrew TurkoSep 8, 2026
Representing Saris Regis, asked the council to follow the Planning Commission's recommendation to exclude residential floor area from FAR calculations and study the impacts first.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 8, 2026 · 2:38:15 →MixedRich HedgesSep 8, 2026
Former councilmember urged more time and community input, backed the Planning Commission's FAR position, and cleared up a rumor about his office-height proposal.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 8, 2026 · 2:40:32 →