Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Asked the council to slow down on removing FAR maximums in R6/R7, saying the public hasn't been given enough information to understand the change.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 36:16 →Said he was confused by the public works presentation on the zoning changes and asked the council to delay so the public can learn more.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 38:10 →Asked the council to keep the 3.5/4.0 FAR limits and add objective historic-resource buffers to the interim ordinance.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 39:20 →Urged delay of the zoning ordinance, citing no buffers, no design review, and no reference to historic resources for buildings up to 75-100 feet next to historic districts.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 31:39 →Called the update a mixed bag — praised district consolidation but urged higher height limits, keeping FAR off residential, and more work on older residential districts.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 8, 2026 · 2:46:02 →Representing Saris Regis, asked the council to follow the Planning Commission's recommendation to exclude residential floor area from FAR calculations and study the impacts first.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 8, 2026 · 2:38:15 →Former councilmember urged more time and community input, backed the Planning Commission's FAR position, and cleared up a rumor about his office-height proposal.
City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 8, 2026 · 2:40:32 →