O
San Mateo
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Planning Commission appointment ethics

San Mateo

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 20, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedLisa MaleyJul 20, 2026

Said the city never responded to her June 18 email and questioned how ethics standards were applied in appointing Seema Patel.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jul 20, 2026 · 1:01:04 →
OpposedMichael ReaganJul 20, 2026

Said three councilmembers had declined to recommend Patel at the selection meeting and urged the council to pull item 20 and start over.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jul 20, 2026 · 23:26 →
SupportiveKevin SimpsonJul 20, 2026

Defended the appointment, saying critics were using ethics as a cudgel and bullying, and urged the council to follow its own ranking policy.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jul 20, 2026 · 26:05 →
OpposedGrace SchwerubJul 20, 2026

Described personal experiences of being mocked online by Ms. Patel and said she could not expect a fair hearing before her; urged appointing someone else.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jul 20, 2026 · 28:52 →
OpposedCharmaine MessinaJul 20, 2026

A 40-year resident who said the council ignored testimony about Patel's conduct and did not follow its own commissioner handbook.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jul 20, 2026 · 59:39 →