O
San Mateo
← Community
RoadsCommunity discussion

El Camino Real plan

San Mateo

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveSean ChauchetSep 22, 2026

Praised the plan's trees, sidewalks, and bike lanes, prioritizing pedestrians, bikes, and beauty over vehicle traffic.

City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 2:05:49 →
NeutralKevin SimpsonSep 22, 2026

Said plan for e-bikes and micromobility of the future, improve outreach beyond pop-ups, and noted new garage parking makes data even better.

City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 3:25:01 →
SupportiveAllison McQueenSep 22, 2026

Said the status quo works for no one, called option four 'the coward's choice,' and pushed for a bike-priority design with narrowed lanes.

City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 22, 2026 · 3:24:53 →
SupportiveSeema PatelFeb 23, 2026

Urged the council to think 10-20 years ahead, noted Belmont prefers the bicycle alternative, and warned that without protected bike lanes riders will use sidewalks unsafely.

City Council Regular Meeting - Feb 23, 2026 · 1:14:45 →
OpposedMichael RaganFeb 23, 2026

Opposed bike lanes on El Camino because they would eliminate all business parking, and suggested forming a new citizens bicycle committee.

City Council Regular Meeting - Feb 23, 2026 · 1:17:00 →
SupportiveMax MautnerFeb 23, 2026

Said the status quo is the least popular option and backed either the bike or transit alternative, noting strong transit reduces parking demand and supports housing growth.

City Council Regular Meeting - Feb 23, 2026 · 1:20:00 →
SupportiveJordan GrimesFeb 23, 2026

Advocated for the transit-focused alternative with bus priority lanes, saying future housing growth and climate goals require people not to drive.

City Council Regular Meeting - Feb 23, 2026 · 1:21:17 →