ALPR surveillance (Item 12)

Volunteers at a foundation serving Muslims in the county; said ALPRs put at-risk constituents in danger.

Member of CORE with immigrant parents; asked for multiple town halls before an eight-year commitment.

With Migrante, a Filipino workers organization; opposed any Axon contract, citing risks to migrant communities.

CAIR legal team member speaking personally; described Flock cameras being used by ICE and abroad.

The lone supportive voice: commended PD for seeking alternatives and said California law provides robust guardrails.

Said a camera network is a pattern-of-life tracker and cited the Merimar Martinez shooting case involving ALPR queries.

Safety Over Surveillance member; asked about contract exit clauses if courts bar ALPRs, and urged more time.

San Mateo native; warned of legal and financial liability and said data flows to ICE regardless of what the chief says.

San Carlos shopper; cited Axon's 2023 cybersecurity disclosure and worried about the data set's sensitivity.

Safety Over Surveillance member; asked for a town hall and ultimately cancellation of all ALPR contracts.

Safety Over Surveillance member who works in San Mateo; asked the city to reconsider mass surveillance and fund basic needs instead.