O
San Mateo
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

220 W. 20th Avenue development

San Mateo

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (14)

At a glance

Public comments
17
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.

Public comments (17)

OpposedReyhan UygurJun 15, 2026

Little Bloom Child Care director opposed the project's scale, citing traffic and drop-off safety for 103 families with young children.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:11:31 →
OpposedRonnie AntonioJun 15, 2026

Asiya Shriners board president asked the council to reject the project, warning tenants could leave and the charitable mission could be lost.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:13:29 →
OpposedRussell BreedJun 15, 2026

A Shriners member and resident asked that the project go back to the developer with the entrance relocated to West 20th Avenue.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:15:39 →
OpposedOleksii ChukaJun 15, 2026

Shriners operations director said the project is an existential threat, citing a traffic study showing the Elkhorn cul-de-sac degrading to level F gridlock.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:18:00 →
OpposedGary StephensJun 15, 2026

Shriners outreach director asked for rejection and a safer design addressing parking and Elkhorn Court congestion.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:20:05 →
OpposedJoe VirgaJun 15, 2026

A former county long-term care ombudsman warned that gridlock would endanger wheelchair-bound seniors using Partners for Independence.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:22:08 →
OpposedSteve WeissJun 15, 2026

A Masonic Lodge treasurer questioned the transit-proximity claim and the adequacy of eight guest parking spots for 232 units.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:23:22 →
OpposedCharles RemingtonJun 15, 2026

Shriners first vice president detailed the children's hospital's 13,471 patients and urged reconsideration to protect the charitable mission.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:26:53 →
OpposedMori MoriuchiJun 15, 2026

A Shriners Hospital supporter urged measures addressing traffic, parking, emergency access, and pedestrian safety.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:29:00 →
OpposedVladimir VergaraJun 15, 2026

A Shriners member and resident cited existing Highway 92 traffic and warned of 'mayhem' on Elkhorn Court.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:30:18 →
OpposedCliff ValdehuerzaJun 15, 2026

Asked the council to prioritize the safety of children and older adults using Elkhorn Court.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:31:05 →
OpposedRonn MitchellJun 15, 2026

Speaking for the Shriners, requested further evaluation of traffic, parking, emergency access, and public safety risks.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:31:33 →
OpposedJanice AntonioJun 15, 2026

Shriners first lady warned the development could threaten the nonprofit's operation and its help for children worldwide.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:33:09 →
SupportiveRich HedgesJun 15, 2026

Supported the project, citing housing needs, state requirements, transit access, and his view that past traffic fears never materialized.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:34:12 →
MixedMichael RaganJun 15, 2026

Beresford-Hillsdale Neighborhood Association president raised traffic and parking concerns and urged the developer to work with the Shriners.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:36:01 →
SupportiveLarissa NyattaJun 15, 2026

SAMCEDA representative supported the project, citing the regional housing shortage and the city's planning efforts.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:38:01 →
OpposedJen Lee CarinoJun 15, 2026

A lifelong resident opposed the project, citing traffic safety, parking, and concern for Asiya Shriners' viability.

City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:40:54 →